Legal Opinion

County of Mercer v. State

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 9, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PRESSLER, J.A.D.

This controversy, which arises under N.J.S.A. 43:15A-1, et seq. (Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS)), raises the question of whether a member of the system under the age of sixty who is receiving periodic workers’ compensation benefits is subject to involuntary retirement on ordinary disability on the application of the employer. We hold that in these circumstances the employer may initiate an ordinary disability retirement pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:15A-42 notwithstanding the subsequently enacted provisions of N.J.S.A. 43:15A-25.1.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Application of Howard SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  2. Flynn v. Union CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Conklin v. City of East OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  4. Pisapia v. NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Marsh v. FinleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James v. Bd. of Trustees of PERSSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  2. Szczepanik v. DEPT. OF TREASURYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  3. JAMES LETTS VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM (POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API