Legal Opinion

Owl Protective Co. v. Feinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, which dismissed on the merits a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a *342determination of the Public Service Commission. The commission dismissed a complaint of petitioners-appellants which averred that the New York Telephone Company refused leased line service in connection with the installation and maintenance of burglar alarm systems. The determination of the Public Service Commission, and the order at Special Term, were based as a matter of law upon a decision of this court (Matter of Owl…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Matter of Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Owl Protective Co. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rothstein v. Equity Ventures, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API