Legal Opinion

Beilstein's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1892No. Appeal, No. 307PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 307, Oct. T., 1891, by Safe Deposit & Trust Co., from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., June T., 1891, No. 115, dismissing petition for citation.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 307, Oct. T., 1891, by Safe Deposit & Trust Co., from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., June T., 1891, No. 115, dismissing petition for citation. On June 6, 1891, the Safe Deposit & Trust Company of Pittsburgh, guardian of Gertrude Beilstein, a minor daughter of George P. Beilstein, Jr., deceased, presented a petition to the court below averring that by the terms of the will of the deceased, the said minor was entitled to the possession of the property known as the old Seaton House, situated at No. 34 Diamond Square, Pittsburgh, but that the executors appointed by said will unjustly…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee. Cubiam,

The court below was entirely right in dismissing the appellant’s petition. Conceding that the minor, Gertie Beilstein, has at least a life-estate in the “ Old Seaton House, situated No. 34 Diamond Square, Pittsburgh,” it by no means follows that she is entitled to the present possession ofeit. The will of George P. Beilstein, under which she claims, creates a trust for her until she becomes of age. In the meantime, she is to be paid twenty-five dollars per month. The corpus of the residuary estate, including the house in question, is to remain in the possession of the trustee…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Siebert v. BirdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Hewson's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1932
  3. In Re Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust, Etc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API