Legal Opinion

Siebert v. Bird

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1982No. Nos. 95, 96, 143, 144, 180, 181, 203 and 204PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This case involves appeals taken by: 1) Tullah Hanley; 2) the heirs of Anna H. Bird; 3) the heirs of Gladys Leahy; and 4) Dennis W. Hillier, Guardian Ad Litem for William L. Hanley, Jr., from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of McKean County, Orphans’ Court Division, denying their exceptions. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

The facts, which are not in dispute, are as follows: By 1932, William L. Hanley (hereinafter referred to as “Mr. Hanley”), age 88, had amassed a sizeable estate as a result of his business acumen. For example, Mr. Hanley founded and served as…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Pew TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Sheets' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  4. Estate of GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Sechler v. SechlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Duggan v. KetoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. In Re Estate of AgostiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. SZYMANOWSKI v. BraceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Estate of TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Galford v. BurkhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API