Legal Opinion

Smith v. Chilton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Question Certified from Court of Civil Appeals, Second District, in an appeal from District Court of Comanche County.

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Associate Justice.

The Court of Civil Appeals for Second Supreme Judicial District have certified to us the following question: “Whether in a suit to recover the penalty provided in Article 3106 of the Revised Statutes of Texas for taking usurious interest the party suing is entitled to recover double the whole amount of interest so received, or only double the excess above what might lawfully have been contracted for and received." The section of the statute referred to was first enacted in this State in 1892 and is as follows: “If usurious interest, as defined by the preceding…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baum v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Cain v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Taylor v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. American Building & Savings Ass'n v. DaughertyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Alston v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API