Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Milton

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1974No. 1499Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSutin, Judge

I concur and dissent.(1) Defendant’s requested instruction concerning identification needs clarification.

The trial court refused defendant’s requested instruction on identification which reads as follows:

You are instructed that in determining the question of identity in this case, you should take into consideration the manner in which such identification was made. If you should find from the evidence in this case that the defendant was first identified by photographic identification then you must determine whether or not the photographic identification procedure was so impermissibly…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. Ben Herbert SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Fred FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Robert John EvansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. Hadder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API