James v. State

The appellant, Andrew James, Sr., appeals from the order of the trial court revoking his probation.

I

The appellant contends that "the trial court should have imposed a less drastic remedy than revocation of probation." (Appellant's Brief at p. 7.) He specifically contends that the revocation of his probation was not in compliance with Rule 26.8, Ala. R. Crim. P., and § 15-22-54, Ala. Code 1975. However, the record reflects that the appellant did not raise this issue in the trial court. Therefore, this issue is not properly preserved for review by this court. See Stallworth v. State, 690 So.2d…