Edgewood Civic Club v. Blaisdell
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.
Zoning regulations are based on certain fundamental propositions. “Such regulations shall be made in accordance with a comprehensive plan” (R. L., c. 51, s. 52) so that zoning is by districts “and not by individual pieces of property” (Kimball v. Blanchard, 90 N. H. 298, 299; R. L., c. 51, s. 51) with a view to the future needs as well as the present conditions of the city. Kimball v. Blanchard, supra, 300. Nonconforming uses existing when the regulations go into effect are allowed to continue but not to multiply when they are harmful or improper. Bassett, Zoning (1940 ed.) 105. Since zoning…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Town of Marblehead v. RosenthalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Nappi, Verona v. La GuardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
3Cited by20 opinions
- Huff v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Town of Nottingham v. HarveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- New London v. LeskiewiczSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- National Marine Underwriters, Inc. v. McCormackSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- McNutt Oil & Refining Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.