Legal Opinion

Connolly v. Industrial Acc. Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1916No. S. F. No. 7645PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Certiorari to review the action of the Industrial Accident Commission in awarding to Louise Connolly compensation for the death of her husband, Edward H. Connolly.

The deceased was very remotely, if at all, related to Patrick Connolly. Edward H. Connolly was doing work as a carpenter on the ranch of said Patrick Connolly when he stepped on a nail and injured his foot. As a result he died of lockjaw. The findings of the Industrial Accident Commission were to the effect that Edward H. Connolly died as the result of an injury which arose out of and happened in the course of his employment; and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carstens v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Englebretson v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Kidder v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Western Grain & Sugar Prod. Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thaxter v. FinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Dyment v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Thrasher v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Black Ex Rel. Black v. IsaakIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API