Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 9, 2021No. 20-9 (L)Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

20-9 (L) United States v. Smith UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Gomez-PerezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. RiggiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. BolesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. BurdenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. BryantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API