Hudgins v. Nashville Bridge Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney
Hudgins, while in the employ of the Bridge Company, suffered an occupational disease known as “lead poisoning, ’ ’ which he insists was attributable to certain acts of negligence on the part of Ms employer. He instituted an action at law to recover damages for the disability that he claims totally disabled him from pursuing his vocation, namely, that of a painter.
The defendant filed a plea in which it was averred that the parties were operating under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Tennessee, Code 1932, section 6851 et seq., and that:
“Said Act provides an exclusive remedy as between the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ashby v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Corbett v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Riggins v. TylerTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Southern Railway Co. v. GrigsbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Shipley v. Wellwood Silk Throwing MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hammett v. Vogue, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
- Hilliard v. ParkTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Churchwell v. CallensCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
- Vaughn v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1944
- Baker v. CarrDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.