Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Andrews

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 13, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, C. J.

The cause of action' of Frank Shoemaker, plaintiff, is that he was seriously injured and the mule which he was riding was killed, as he alleges, by the negligence of Andrews, the defendant. The notice, as amended, alleges that while he was proceeding in a westerly direction on the highway, keeping close to the right or north side, and Andrews was driving his automobile in an easterly direction upon the north or wrong side *173of the highway, at the excessive rate of speed of forty-five miles an hour, without lights, the time being about 6 p. m., January 13, 1928, the defendant recklessly,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Meade v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  2. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  3. Ricketts v. J. G. McCrory Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  4. Cardwell v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  5. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. BanksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tabb v. WillisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  2. Harris v. HowertonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  3. Baecher v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  4. Ellison v. Hampton & Langley Field Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  5. Charles S. Callander, as Administrator of the Estate of Alexander S. Callander, Deceased v. Hunter Motor Lines, Inc., and Charley Henry BattleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API