Legal Opinion

Holland v. McDade

California Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1899No. S. F. No. 1123PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Erancisco. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This appeal is from the judgment, without a hill of exceptions, and the questions involved arise upon the face of the complaint.

The action is one against McDade, former sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco, for damages claimed to have resulted from his refusal to release certain property of plaintiff *354from execution, and also in publishing notice of sale thereof under said execution. This execution was issued and levied under a money judgment in the case of Curry v. Holland. Holland’s motion for a new trial in that case was denied, whereupon he appealed-from the order denying the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Central Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Heller v. Dyerville Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Fulton v. HannaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Carit v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Crocker-Huffman Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
  2. Weldon v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Kerr v. O'KeefeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Kaufman v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Brown v. RatliffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API