Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Milum

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1968No. 45,130Published

1DissentFontron, J.

I am in accord with the court’s enunciation of the general principles which govern the granting of a continuance. However, I am compelled to disagree with the majority as to the application of those principles to the facts of this case.

A few additional facts should be noted. The defendant’s notice of alibi stated that proof would be offered showing the defendant was at The Retreat, 917 East 30th, Kansas City, Missouri, at the *201time the alleged robbery took place. Six witnesses were named as supporting the alibi, one of them being James Hendrix.

When Hendrix failed to appear at the trial, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clouston v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API