Legal Opinion

Clouston v. Gray

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Ness District Court. Replevin by Gray against Clouston, as sheriff of Ness county. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant brings error. The material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action of replevin, brought in the district court of Ness county on March 7, 1888, by S. F. Gray against J. W. Clouston, sheriff of said county, to recover certain personal property previously levied on by Clouston under an execution issued in an action wherein Leander Rokes was the judgment creditor and James Gray was the judgment debtor. The property was levied on as the property of James Gray. The defendant answered on March 9, 1888, by filing a general denial. In May, 1888, the case came up regularly for trial, but was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Educational Ass'n of Christian Churches v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
  2. Batchelor v. WalburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. Board of Regents of Kansas State Agricultural College v. LinscottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Marix v. FrankeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  5. Simpson v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MilumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. State v. WaldronSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. First National Bank v. VenardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Josephson v. SigfussonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State v. MilumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API