Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 24, 1965No. C.D. 2589PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

Presented for the court’s determination is the proper classification for customs duty purposes of two high vacuum melting and casting furnaces, designated as VSG-10 and VSG-25, respectively, and certain parts therefor, which were imported from Switzerland and are covered by the above-enumerated protests.

*272The merchandise was classified as laboratory instruments and metal parts thereof in paragraph 360 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, and was assessed with duty at the rate of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Instrumentation Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Schick X-Ray Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  5. B. & K. Instruments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API