Salmon v. Concordia Fire Ins. Co. of Milwaukee
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WE STERFIELD, Judge.
The plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Clarke Salmon, brought this suit against the Concordia Fire Insurance Company of Milwaukee under two policies of fire insurance, claiming $127.70 as the proportionate loss due by the defendant company (there being other insurance) resulting from the destruction by fire of a bangle bracelet belonging .to Mrs. Salmon. The defendant resisted payment upon the ground that the loss was sustained in a manner not covered by the policy.
There was judgment below in favor of plaintiff for $121.46, with legal interest thereon from June 22, 1934, together…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ermentrout v. Girard Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Reliance Insurance Co. v. NamanTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Caballero v. Home Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
- Weiner v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924
- Harter v. Ph&338nix Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mode, Ltd. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Youse v. Employers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Consoli v. COMMONWEALTH INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
- LL Freeberg Pie Co. v. St. Paul Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Levert-St. John, Inc. v. Birmingham Fire & Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.