Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion · Dissent

Larson & Larson, P.A. v. TSE Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 5, 2009No. SC08-428Published

1DissentLewis, J.

I dissent because I am in substantial agreement with the logical, reasonable analysis provided by the Second District Court of Appeal below, which provided an intellectually sound holding:

*53On the merits, this case is controlled by Silvestrone because it involves legal malpractice that arises out of the handling of litigation. See Fremont Indem. Co. v. Carey, Dwyer, Eckhart, Mason & Spring, P.A., 796 So.2d 504, 505-06 (Fla.2001). In Silvestrone, the Florida Supreme Court resolved a conflict between the district courts regarding whether the statute of limitations for legal malpractice begins to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blumberg v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Silvestrone v. EdellSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  4. J.P. Stevens Company, Inc., Badische Corporation and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Gaynon v. StatumSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API