Rumbaugh v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COBEY, Acting P. J.
Petitioner William Rumbaugh contends that the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) erred in calculating pursuant to Labor Code section 4658 1 the dollar value of the awards for his two industrial back injuries. 2
Since April 1, 1972, section 3 has provided a graduated scale whereunder the number of weekly benefits increases in proportion to the percentage of the permanent disability. (Fuentes v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1976) 16 Cal.3d 1, 4 [128 Cal.Rptr. 673, 547 P.2d 449]; Aten v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1977) 75 Cal.App.3d 113, 117 [142 Cal.Rptr.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Wilkinson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Lundberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Bstandig v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nuelle v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Harold v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Fullmer v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Parker v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Department of Education v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.