Legal Opinion
Zannini v. Ameritrade Holding Corp.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 2003No. S-02-142PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.
I. NATURE OF CASE
Appellants, David Zannini, Christopher Pitcher, Anthony Párente, and William Sigler, filed this purported class action on behalf of themselves as well as all other subscribers to the brokerage and securities clearing services offered by appellees, Ameritrade Holding Corp.; Ameritrade, Inc.; Ameritrade Clearing, Inc.; and Advanced Clearing, Inc. (collectively Ameritrade). Appellants’ “Second Amended Class Action Complaint at Law” is the operative petition (petition). The focus of the petition taken as a whole is that Ameritrade failed to provide securities trading services as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- International Paper Co. v. OuelletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Guice v. Charles Schwab & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re Ames Department Stores Inc. Stock LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Controlled Environments Construction, Inc. v. Key Industrial Refrigeration Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Diversified Telecom Services, Inc. v. ClevingerNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Marksmeier v. McGregor Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Collett v. CollettNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Appleby v. AndreasenNebraska Court of Appeals · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.