Legal Opinion
Printed Terry Finishing Co. v. City of Lebanon
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 9, 1979No. 1642PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that interest on a reduced verdict obtained after a new trial on damages should not run from the date of the original verdict when the new trial was necessitated by the misconduct of appellee’s counsel. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the order of the court below.
The case is a continuation of Printed Terry Finishing Company, Inc. v. City of Lebanon, 247 Pa.Super. 277, 372 A.2d 460 (1977), wherein the facts are set forth in greater detail. To summarize, after the jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee, Printed Terry, as to liability, a partner of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. Of Philadelphia v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- California Fruit Exchange v. HenryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Mix v. North American Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Printed Terry Finishing Co. v. City of LebanonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- In re Allegheny County Controller's Amended Annual Report 1967-1978Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- MPower Software Serv. v. American Water WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Prisco v. North American Furniture Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.