Legal Opinion

Cirillo v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBernstein, J.

The plaintiff, an auto machinist employed in the department of sanitation of the city of New York, has brought these actions to recover the sum of one dollar a day for each working day of his employment during the years 1927 to 1932, inclusive. The actions are test actions, and the decisions, under the stipulation of the parties, are to apply to the cases of some 250 employees of the city who are similarly situated.

It appears from the evidence that the city employs certain mechanics under two distinct titles, “ machinists ” and “ auto machinists.” Both-titled positions are under civil…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Gaston v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Matter of Carr v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Olsen v. Brooklyn Ash Removal Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Ziegler v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cirillo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API