Legal Opinion
Matter of Carr v. Kern
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 29, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.
The petitioners have passed qualifying examinations given by the Municipal Civil Service Commission for the position of “ House Painter.” Four of them have had employment in the Department of Plant and Structures as “ House Painters ” at $9.50 a day. The New York city budget for 1935 eliminated the position of “ House Painter ” in the Department of Plant and Structures, and made no appropriation therefor, but provided for “ Painters (Ship Repair Work) ” at $8 per day, although there was no such civil service classification. The petitioners were certified together with others, some of whom…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of Gaston v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Wood v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- People Ex Rel. Plancon v. . PrendergastNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Story v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Matter of Simpson v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Campbell v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Matter of Hoof v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Guercio v. GerosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Barnett v. MorrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
- Cirillo v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.