International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1DissentTamm, Circuit Judge
The National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter the “Board”) is permitted *1349to draw reasonable inferences from facts presented to it, Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRB, 324 U.S. 793, 800, 65 S.Ct. 982, 89 L.Ed. 1372 (1945), including an adverse inference from the failure to produce relevant evidence. NLRB v. Wal-lick, 198 F.2d 477, 483 (3rd Cir. 1952). The majority concludes that in the case at bar the Board must draw an adverse inference from Gyrodyne’s failure to produce the requested documents.1 While I concur in the thirty day reprieve granted Gyrodyne, I respectfully dissent from the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Falk Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.