Legal Opinion

In re Biersack

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 15, 1916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Application by a general guardian to require an administratrix to render and settle a final account.

1Opinion of the Court

Ketcham, S. —

This is an application by Louise Biersack, as general guardian of Frederick W. Kruse, Jr., an infant, to require the administratrix of Frederick W. Kruse, deceased, to render and settle a final account.

Louise Biersack is the mother of the infant. The intestate was his father.

It is conceded that Mrs. Biersack was married to one Bach-man on June 15, 1902, that such marriage was never legally dissolved, that the parties thereto have never been divorced and that Bachman still lives.

At the time of the marriage with' Bachman, Mrs. Biersack was fifteen years old. Her husband deserted…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gall v. . GallNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Fenton v. ReedNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  3. Caujolle v. . FerrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  4. Stokes v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Maier v. BrockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Faggard v. FilipowichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Bloch v. EwingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
  3. Routledge v. GithensOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Alto v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Atwater v. EwingDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API