United States v. Pond and Fanelli
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PIERCE, District Judge.
The defendants herein have been charged in a two count indictment with conspiracy to violate federal narcotics laws and with illegal possession of approximately 77 pounds of marijuana. Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Fed.R.Crim. P. both defendants have moved to suppress the evidence on the ground that it was seized under a defective search warrant. Defendant Pond has also moved to suppress post-arrest statements on various alternative grounds. An evidentiary hearing was held relating to these matters.
A. Motion to Suppress the Evidence
It appears that a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. LypkaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Commonwealth v. StonerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- United States v. Jacques Berenguer, A/K/A Guy SebbaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- David R. Wilson v. The Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Steven Pond and David FanelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.