Capistrano Beach Water District v. Taj Development Corporation
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
We decide here whether a sewer connection fee of capacity charge, paid by a developer to connect its hotel to a sanitation district’s sewer system, falls within the definition of a “development fee” under Government Code section 66000 1 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act, hereafter the Act). The Act restricts the imposition and use of development fees and provides developers a limited right of refund. (§ 66001, subd. (e).) The right to a refund was not allowed for sewer connection fees and capacity charges under the Act in place at the time of the underlying action. (Former §…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Oldham v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Usher v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richmond v. Shasta Community Services DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Barratt American, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- California Building Industry Ass'n v. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Barratt American, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Coziahr v. Otay Wat. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.