Legal Opinion

Steyer v. Morris

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 2, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Pope County; the Hon. Robert W. McCartney, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

The questions here presented arise under Sec. 22, Chap. 64, Starr & C. Ill. Statutes, imposing the duty upon a guardian “to put and keep his ward’s money at interest.” Exceptions were taken by both parties to the decree below, and error is assigned by appellant for allowing interest upon uninvested funds of the ward. Appellee assigns for cross-errors the allowance of $20 attorney’s fee, failing to charge the guardian with interest on balances as shown by his reports, and in considering the evidence of Steyer. Appellant’s counsel contend, under the facts proven, it was error to allow any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rowan v. KirkpatrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Wadsworth v. ConnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. McIntyre v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Gilbert v. GuptillIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Cummins v. CumminsIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Boyd's GuardianshipNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API