United States v. Longoria
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
In Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the Supreme Court held: “Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted tó a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. at 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348. In the wake of Apprendi, this court and all our sister circuits have unanimously agreed that drug quantities triggering increased penalties under 21 U.S.C. § 841 are facts that must be submitted to a jury and charged in an indictment under the Ap-prendi rule. See…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States v. DoggettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Jose Gerardo Mendoza-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Mejia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Oscar v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Brandon WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. CreechCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.