Legal Opinion

1000 Friends of Oregon v. Board of Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 1979No. 77-8-255, CA 11132PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

This writ of review proceeding involves the propriety of a variance allowing a residential subdivision developer to serve a previously approved subdivision by individual wells rather than a community water supply system. The Clackamas County Board of Commissioners (Board) granted the variance. Petitioner challenged the Board’s action by writ of review. The circuit court dismissed the writ and petitioner appeals urging three contentions: (1) the Board improperly applied the ordinance which allows a variance; (2) the Board’s findings were not supported by substantial evidence; and (3) LCDC…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bienz v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woodcock v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Hilliard v. Lane County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. City of Happy Valley v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Lemke v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API