Legal Opinion

Griffin v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1991No. 86-1512PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Senior Judge:

To decide this motion, we must address the issue of whether Griffin has been denied the effective assistance of counsel on his direct appeal. We find that the failure of Griffin’s prior counsel on appeal to raise a double jeopardy issue on appeal makes a showing of “sufficient merit” on Griffin’s claim of ineffective assistance with respect to the charge of obstructing justice to warrant the recall of our mandate previously issued.

In so far as relevant to this appeal, the record shows the following events. In January 1985, Griffin was presented in the Superior Court on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ready v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Jeffrey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Metts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Gooch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Long v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API