Legal Opinion

Canfield v. Oberzan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 22, 1966No. 44,258PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

This is an action for damages by Hazel Canfield, plaintiff (appellee), against James Oberzan, defendant (appellant), and E. R. McKinney, d/b/a The McKinney Motor Co., codefendant, for damages received by appellee arising from a two automobile collision at a country road intersection on May 20, 1962, at about 7:30 p. m. The case was tried to a jury, commencing on June 1, 1964, and on June 4, 1964, the jury returned its verdict in the sum of $10,750.00 in favor of appellee Canfield against appellant Oberzan. Miss Canfield alleged in her petition…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sponable v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Drake v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Gard v. Sherwood Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  4. Grisamore v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  5. Deemer v. ReichartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hollinger v. Jane C. Stormont Hospital & Training School for NursesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  2. Sweaney v. United Loan & Finance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. State v. SchroederSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Jacks v. CloughleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Howard v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API