S.V. v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
*1176I
INTRODUCTION
Under separation of powers principles, when the Legislature has enacted a statute with limited exceptions, courts may not add additional exceptions. (See Cal. Const., art. III, § 3.) In 2014, the Legislature enacted a statute that generally requires a juvenile court to seal a minor's confidential delinquency file following a dismissal. The court cannot later unseal and release information in the file to others, except in eight limited circumstances for certain designated parties (e.g., the probation department). ( Welf. & Inst. Code, § 786, subds. (a)(1), (f)(1)(A)-(H).)1 A third…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cajon Valley Union School District v. DragerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- In re Parker B.California Court of Appeal · 2026
- Moore v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Super. Ct. (Ortiz)California Court of Appeal · 2022