Legal Opinion

S.V. v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 31, 2017No. G053903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

*1176I

INTRODUCTION

Under separation of powers principles, when the Legislature has enacted a statute with limited exceptions, courts may not add additional exceptions. (See Cal. Const., art. III, § 3.) In 2014, the Legislature enacted a statute that generally requires a juvenile court to seal a minor's confidential delinquency file following a dismissal. The court cannot later unseal and release information in the file to others, except in eight limited circumstances for certain designated parties (e.g., the probation department). ( Welf. & Inst. Code, § 786, subds. (a)(1), (f)(1)(A)-(H).)1 A third…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cajon Valley Union School District v. DragerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  2. In re Parker B.California Court of Appeal · 2026
  3. Moore v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. Super. Ct. (Ortiz)California Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API