Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Beard

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 7, 2011No. 07-9005PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BARRY, Circuit Judge.

I. Introduction

We have approached this case with the utmost seriousness. We are humbled by the fact that over a twenty-eight-year period of time, the case has progressed through courts of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the U.S. District Court without James Lambert having been granted relief. We, nonetheless, must decide this case consistent with what we believe our obligation to be, while according the utmost respect to the standard of review that we are required to apply. Having done so, we now vacate the judgment of the District Court dated…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. LambertSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Munchinski v. WilsonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. State v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Com. v. Reese, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Conley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API