Legal Opinion

State v. Quick

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 29, 1994No. 18A92PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

This appeal presents questions regarding the mitigating circumstance that defendant has no significant history of prior criminal activity, N.C.G.S. § 15A-2000(f)(l) (1988), and whether the State improperly offered evidence of defendant’s silence during a pretrial interrogation. Concluding there was reversible error in failing to submit the mitigating circumstance and at least error in offering evidence of defendant’s silence, we vacate the sentence of death and remand for a new sentencing hearing.

This is defendant’s second appeal of a death sentence. At his first trial he…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. McKoy v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. State v. VandiverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. BonnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. State v. HurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API