Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Nettles

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1931No. 1229-5600PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.

In this ease defendant in error, the claimant in an action under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, was found to be totally and permanently incapacitated by reason of injuries received in the course of her employment, and the insurer was compelled to redeem its liability by the payment of a lump sum. In arriving at the amount to be paid, the trial court, without any evidence or jury finding as to the rate of discount, arrived at the present value. of the unmatured weekly payments when redeemed in a lump sum by discounting the same at the legal rate of 6 per cent, and rendered judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Texas Employers' Ins. v. HerzingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. NettlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Holloway v. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. StephensTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. BrockTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. HittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. SlusserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API