Legal Opinion

Haught v. City of Dayton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1972No. 3949Published

1Opinion of the CourtGrawfoRd, J.

A concise factual summary of this case is presented in the document entitled “Statement of Case in Lieu of Transcript” and is as follows:

“On or about February 17, 1972, Robert Haught and nine other plaintiffs in this action, along with persons not parties to this action, all of whom are employed by The City of Dayton, Department of Fire, in the classification of Firefighter, received a notice from the Civil Service Board entitled ‘Employment Status Change Resulting from Reduction in Force,’ which notice advised Plaintiffs and said other persons that they were to be laid off from their jobs as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tuber v. PerkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In Re Appeal of ClementsOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Application of LathamOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Stocker v. WoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. In Re Passage of Ordinance No. 105-62Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API