Legal Opinion
United States v. Barroso
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 7, 2000No. 99CR1025 (SAS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
On February 18, 2000, following a four-day jury trial, defendant David Barroso was convicted of conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud. Defendant now seeks a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29 or, in the alternative, a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 38. For the following reasons, defendant’s post-trial motions are denied.
I. Background
In a single-count indictment, the Government charged Barroso and two co-defendants, Marlon and Frederick Tropeano, with conspiring to defraud…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Gray v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Frederick Tropeano, and Marlon Tropeano, David Barroso, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- McCloud, Jr. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- United States v. HendersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006