Little v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Dissent
PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired,
dissenting:
The crucial issue in this case — the one my colleagues have declined to address — is not the timeliness of the appeal from the March 19, 1979 order, but rather the appealability of that order in the first place. It is settled now that this court’s jurisdiction is limited to review of final orders and judgments. Butler v. United States, D.C.App., 388 A.2d 883, 885 (1978); Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 379 A.2d 708, 709 (1977); D.C. Code 1973, § 11-721(a). Since it is almost too clear for discussion that no appealable order has been brought here for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. DieterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Reginald JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Coleman v. Lee Washington Hauling Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.