Brutoco Engineering & Construction, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHLI, Acting P. J.
This action involves the procedure to be followed in a contractual arbitration between the Department of Transportation of the State of California (State) and a private party or parties, as governed by the Public Contract Code. We find that the trial court correctly declined to consider proposed arbitrators who have not been certified by the Public Works Contract Arbitration Committee, and instead confined itself to persons on that list or panel. Accordingly, we will deny the petition.
Statement of Facts
Petitioner Brutoco Engineering & Construction, Inc. (Brutoco)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Cooper v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Collection Bureau of San Jose v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Haas v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Imagistics International, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Coffman Specialties, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Sehulster Tunnels/Pre-Con v. Traylor Brothers, Inc./Obayashi Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Imagistics International, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Western Growers Assn. v. Occupational Safety & Health Stds. Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2022