Legal Opinion

International Meters, Inc. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel Dickstein, J.

This is a taxpayers’ action brought under section 51 of the General Municipal Law to restrain the defendants from perfecting or awarding a proposed contract for the purchase of parking meters after the opening of bids therefor.

Plaintiffs assert in their complaint that the notice of proposal for bids and the specifications are unreasonable, arbitrary and illegal in at least two respects, thus precluding free and competitive bidding and causing a waste of the taxpayers’ money. The first of these two requirements that plaintiffs ’ claim is arbitrary, unreasonable and illegal is as follows: “…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Talcott v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Altschul v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Western New York Water Co. v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Matter of McNutt Co. v. EckertNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Grace v. ForbesNew York Supreme Court · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gerzof v. SweeneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API