Legal Opinion

Ball v. Mallinkrodt Chemical Works

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 16, 1964PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, P.J.

Mrs. Lorene Ball brought suit against Dr. Jesse Adams, a vascular surgeon, charging malpractice in the performance of a test known as trans-lumbar aortogram by the injection of Urokon 70, manufactured and sold by the defendant Mallinkrodt Chemical Works. Her husband sued in a separate action for loss of services and medical expenses incurred in the treatment of Mrs. Ball. The two cases were tried together.

The Court refused to allow the case to go to the jury as to certain charges contained in the declarations but, as to others, the motion for a directed verdict was overruled. The jury…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quinley v. CockeTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Management Services, Inc. v. HellmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  3. Floyd v. WallsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  4. Gresham v. FordTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Tindell v. BowersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Shadrick v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Truan v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Nishi v. HartwellHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Harden v. Danek Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API