Legal Opinion
Harden v. Danek Medical, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided August 31, 1998No. 03A01-9801-CV-00020PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKS, J.
In this action for allegedly manufacturing a defective product which harmed plaintiff, the Trial Judge granted defendant summary judgment, and plaintiff has appealed.
The principal issue on appeal stated in plaintiffs brief is:
Did the Trial Court commit reversible error by holding that no genuine issues of material fact existed in the record on August 19, 1997, and granting summary judgment to the defendant on that basis.
Appellant in his brief argues that the Trial Judge committed several errors which were not specified as issues in the statement of issues. The issue as stated…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Shadrick v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Toole v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Whaley v. PerkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- Newcomb v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- Eddie C. Pratcher, Jr. v. Methodist Healthcare Memphis HospitalsTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Evelyn Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- King Bradley, Jr. v. Ameristep, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.