Legal Opinion

Guccione v. Scott

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to recover back contribution of capital under special, provision of copartnership articles. •

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

On May 12, 1894, the plaintiff, defendant and one. Hazen entered into articles of copartnership for the carrying on the business of manufacturing and selling “ vermouth ” and other cordials. -Scott and Hazen contributed the stock, fixtures and good will of the business theretofore carried on by them, and plaintiff agreed to contribute $2,500, of which $2,000 was to be paid 'at once, and $500 when required. The agreement contained a special provision that plaintiff might withdraw from the firm by giving his partners five months’ written notice of his intention so to do, at the end of which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bagley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. Duncan v. LyonNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
  3. Ransom v. WheelwrightAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  4. Hunt v. GookinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stern v. LowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  2. Bayview General Hospital v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API