Ransom v. Wheelwright
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendants from an affirmance by the General Term of the Oity Court of a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon a verdict of a jury for $l,787.50 damages, in an action to recover commissions on sales as a compensation under a contract of employment.
1Opinion of the Court
Daly, P. J.. The contract of employment between the plaintiff and the defendants was- made April 28, 1890,' and provided that the plaintiff was to act as salesman for defendants and to represent and sell their goods under, their instructions' and limits in foreign countries for one year from that date; and further provided “ That said Jonathan-H. Ransom, Jr., is to receive a commission of 2-¡- per cent, on all sales not made directly to the purchaser by him. On all such sales not' made directly .by Mr.' Ransom, but such as aré considered by Wkéelwright, Eldridge & Oo.. to be the result of his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoffman v. Ætna Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- City of Brooklyn v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Barlow v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- People ex rel. Mitchel v. LaGrangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Hummel v. SternThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leighton v. NEW YORK, SUSQUEHANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD CO.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Guccione v. ScottNew York Supreme Court · 1897
- Ransom v. WheelwrightAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897