State v. Williamson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Watts, J., Greenwood, March term, 1902. Indictment against Henry R. Williamson, Charley Snow and Anthony Reeder. Prom judgment on verdict of guilty, defendants, Williamson and Snow, now appeal.
Read the full summary
Before Watts, J., Greenwood, March term, 1902. Indictment against Henry R. Williamson, Charley Snow and Anthony Reeder. Prom judgment on verdict of guilty, defendants, Williamson and Snow, now appeal. Mr. Bilis G. Graydon cites: Jurors not competent: 16 S. C., 453; 20 S. C., 444; 25 S. C., 171; 26 S. C., 198; 31 S. C., 257; 32 S. C., 45; 34 S. C., 33; 36 S. C., 504; 39 S. C., 97; 54 S. C., 147. Error to allow solicitor to ask defendant if he had been indicted of perjury: Con., art. I., sec. 17; Crim. Code, 64. Solicitor applied improper epithet to defendants: 33 S. C., 582; 34 S. C., 16; 35…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
The defendants, Williamson and Snow, were indicted for an assault and battery with intent to kill one J. H. Werts, and now appeal from the judgment and sentence rendered upon the verdict against them.
1 1. The first six exceptions complain of error in not excluding as incompetent certain jurors who, when examined upon their voir ¡lire, said they had formed and expressed their opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the accused, and that it would require evidence on the part of the defendant to remove that impression from their minds.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilbur v. FloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Clemens v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- State v. ShawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
3Cited by33 opinions
- Elliott v. Black River Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
- The People v. HalkensIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. MittleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- State v. BighamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.