Legal Opinion

United States v. Dickens

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided May 25, 1990No. ACMR 8902247Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GILLEY, Judge:

Pursuant to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty of conspiracy to commit two larcenies and a burglary, larceny (two specifications), burglary, and unlawful receipt of stolen property, in violation of Articles 81, 121, 129, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 921, 929, and 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ], respectively. The convening authority approved the sentence of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty-three months, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances.

The appellant contends that a rehearing is required because the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. PooleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. HarrisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  5. United States v. CarrollU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API