Legal Opinion
Hayber v. Department of Consumer Protection
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided March 8, 2004No. File No. CV-020513973PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
In this administrative appeal, the plaintiff real estate broker, Eugene A. Hayber, challenges an order by the defendant real estate commission that he make restitution to certain third parties.
I
FACTS
In 1997, the plaintiff was a licensed real estate broker. In 1997, he was retained by Steven Rocco and Jonathon *193Gottlieb to market the sale of property at 106 High Street in Higganum. On or about May 8, 1995, the plaintiff entered into an exclusive right to sell contract with Rocco and Gottlieb to sell the residential property. The property was to be listed for $215,000. The contract required…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Schultz v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hayber v. Department of Consumer ProtectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005