Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Barfield

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 10, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Reagan. Fayette superior court. October 28, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtEish, J.

1. Though an acknowledgment of service entered on a bill of exceptions be not dated, yet if it otherwise affirmatively appear from official entries thereon that it was actually served within the time prescribed by law, the writ of error will not be dismissed on the ground that the fact of service-does not duly appear.

2. "When the defendant to a case goes to trial on the petition and answer, and does not, by demurrer or appropriate motion in the nature thereof, challenge •the legal sufficiency of the petition, it is not improper to try the case accordingly. Applying this well-settled rule to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Macon Consolidated Street Railroad v. BarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barfield v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Browning v. Village of Cave SpringCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. Clanton v. RowanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Washington & Lincolnton Railroad v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API