Legal Opinion

Youngworth v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided January 11, 1990No. C-C-89-0421-PPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROBERT D. POTTER, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

THIS MATTER is before the Court on a Memorandum and Recommendation (hereinafter “M & R”), filed by United States Magistrate Paul B. Taylor on November 17, 1989.

The Court is required, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, to make a de novo review of those portions of the M & R to which objection is made. The M & R recommended granting Petitioner’s habeas corpus motion brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Furthermore, the Magistrate recommended Petitioner be given credit for 476 days towards his federal sentence to reflect the time Petitioner served in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Edward Lester Schronce, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  3. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. WILWORDING Et Al. v. SWENSON, WARDENSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. J. Ferber Coleman v. Courtland C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lewis Thomas v. Patrick WhalenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. Cozine v. CrabtreeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1998
  3. Meagher v. DuggerDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
  4. Cowles v. BrooksDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
  5. Grant v. SaulDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API